Last month at the TS2 Show I taught a class about lessons learned as a trade show marketer. After all the other students had left, a young exhibit manager approached me and asked, “Everybody in my company thinks of me as the trade show guy. How do I make them think of me as themarketing guy?”
He’s certainly not alone in his quest to grow more into a marketing role. To get into marketing, it helps to understand what exactly marketing is. So here are 10 experts’ definitions of marketing, plus for good measure my reactions to the strengths and weaknesses of their definitions.
I like how this is so focused on both the strategic and functional aspects of marketing, but especially that it’s so customer-focused – the word customer is in it three times, more than any other word!
This definition took the AMA years of debate to create. It is a very comprehensive, yet concise definition, encompassing the product development, marketing communications, pricing, and strategic aspects of marketing.
Regis McKenna’s bold statement exemplifies the school of thought that everything you do – not just your products, pricing, promotion, and distribution, but even your billing, how you answer the phone, your speed of handling problems –it all affects how your customer perceives your company, so everything is marketing.
Management guru Drucker also advocates that marketing is everything, plus he provides reasons to back it up.
This is more of an old-school, college-professor definition, which while accurate, is fairly cold. I think the “social process” part diverts attention from the business side, and “individuals” sounds more clinical than “customers” which is the gold standard in many of these definitions.
This is even more a college-professor definition. The idea of society evolving distributive systems seems to take the shine off of the inventiveness and initiative of individual marketers.
This is just part of a passionate rant by Jay Conrad Levinson of Guerilla Marketing fame, which highlights the role of persuasion in marketing.
Jantsch’s definition also picks up on Levinson’s theme of persuasion, at an even more personal level than Levinson.
I like how the CIM’s definition is so concise and yet so all-encompassing, and how marketing’s job is to take care of the customer, while making a buck, too.
This too-concise definition is nearly identical to the CIM definition right before it, without the management, the profitability, and especially the customer. So I like the CIM definition better.
The underlying thread in many of these definitions that resonates most with me is that marketing’s job is to understand what the customer needs and then to provide it – and that the job of marketing goes beyond the marketing department.
So if you want to have a greater role in marketing, then focus on how the entire experience your customers have in your trade show exhibits and displays creates more impetus for them to buy from you, rather than just the logistics of shipping your exhibit properties. At that point you’ve shifted your mindset into the realm of marketing.
Does that help? Whose definition do you like best? Let us know in the comments box below, or share a better definition of marketing that you prefer.
Want to expand your marketing impact at trade shows? The What’s Working In Exhibiting White Paper reveals the successful marketing strategies and tactics of over 170 exhibit marketers. Click here to get your free copy.
Comment by Trevor Punt on September 24, 2010 at 10:23
Comment by Trevor Punt on September 24, 2010 at 14:50 Add a Comment
© 2012 Created by Trevor Punt.
You need to be a member of Event Crowd to add comments!
Join Event Crowd